Just a Note we have moved from WordPress.com to to our own domain at http://scribez.com/ Please update your RSS links and blogrolls.
We Have Moved Please Update Your RSS Feeds
Comments Off
Posted in General
Scribez On Its Own Domain More Exciting Things To Come
When we started this blog we had started it with a bang. It had become one of the most popular blogs on WordPress.com and had been featured on WordPress Top Blogs a number of times.
I been meaning to move Scribez to its own domain for a really long time finally not the blog has moved to its own domain name. When we started the blog initially we had brainstormed a lot to come up with a name that was easy to remember and available to register. I have been a busy running my own blog at www.clazh.com
For now I am trying to take one step at a time. here is the list of thing we’ll be doing In another one to two months time.
- We’ll be moving to our own Web hosting on Media Temple.
- The Blog will be sport a custom kick ass design.
- I now looking for new authors to join us since most of the old ones are inactive.
- I am trying to come up with a plan to compensate the authors. (Free T-shirts, allow them to put ads on their blogs)
So watch out.
Posted in Technology
Who is Matt ?
Some of you might have already heard about Matt.
Last year, his video “Where the Hell is Matt ?” was one of the most played (> 6,000,000 views) videos on the internet.
But, who is Matt ? What is the story behind him ?
His full name is Matt Harding, a former designer and writer for videogames.
In 2003 he quit his job and started traveling around the world.
The idea to produce a video that show him dancing during his journey was given by a travel buddy.
The 2005 Video
After producing the first video in 2005 a sponsor asked Matt about a second video.
They paid the bill and the next journey started… and the result we are all aware of!
The 2006 Video
You can read a whole interview with Matt here and/or view another interview below.
Matt Harding Interview
Matt published another video where he shows his mistakes and his bad dancing style.
Matt’s Outtakes
The new project is currently running and you can now participate in it.
You can sign up to dance with Matt here.
Crossposted by Cybernout at http://cybernout.wordpress.com/
And…we’re back!!!
The Pretender’s Guide To Shut Up
I am tonight, a man on a mission. I will be putting aside my modesty when I write this blog. Those thinking that I am blowing my own pipe will actually realize that they feel the same way deep inside. For tonight, I am angry-as-hell at a pathetic group of people hell bent on ruining a good vibe – The Pretenders (and to a lesser extent, The Wanna-be).
What ripped my facade of tolerance and fueled my rage today was a statement by a man of stunted intellectual abilities claiming that he has been an Iron Maiden fan since he was in the 6th grade. His favourite Maiden album being Brave New World which he claims to have bought in 7th grade. That would be in 1997-98. The album of course came out in 2000. As a Maiden fan and a serious music buff, I was shocked at this blasphemy. It is understandable that such a statement would be uttered to raise one’s position in a social circle. It is also inevitable that such statements will now be flying around since Maiden will be performing in Bangalore. We got into an argument when I revealed the true time of release of the said album. As expected, he lost his temper and I lost mine. My rage stemmed from the fact that every song that the bastard had in his computer came from my collection. His social networking site profile shows the name of every artist who’s song he has burned and taken from me. And he thinks he can argue with me on music?
This incident only serves as a starting point to my rant. There are people who claim to be big fans of serious films. Any attempt
at discussing any of the “admired” films reveal the shallow depths of their
understanding of the film and the searing heights of their illusions of
grandeur. The same goes for games. Idiots who claim that Half Life is boring because the graphics are dated. The same goes for books. Idiots who claim that they are fans of The Da Vinci Code and go around talking about Magdalene and The Priory like they’ve researched about it for years.
The main point that I am trying to discuss here is that these fermented remnants of bovine excreta don’t have a point of view of their own but keep peddling articles and reviews from other sources as if it’s their own ideas. I must point out that there are those who use the same said sources to enhance their understanding rather than define it. I see no harm in this form of growth. Everyone does that, you shape your ideas based on others’. But to claim that these ideas are your own is indecent and below human dignity. There are many who mock me for my tastes but secretly they
wish they had it. One develops a sense of identity by first assuming
others’ and then growing into their own (ofcourse there are the
counter-culturists, but again, they grow into their own identities as well).
When a wanna-be tries to up the ante on you, you get pissed. Not just because the credibility of his argument is suspect, or the fact that he will not accept his fault when all is revealed, but also because it is demeaning to your ego when a person of clearly inferior intellect tries to undermine yours. The target of a pretender’s verbal diarrhea is always the intellectual. By proving that he is superior to the intellectual, the pretender basks in the false sense of his superiority.
I was a pretender once. There isn’t anyone anywhere who hasn’t claimed to have done this or done that while he never has. But slowly, I grew older and a bit wiser. The lies and deceits that one creates around one-self to exude a false aura of superiority slowly begins to appear pointless and you realize your real worth and standing in the world, which mostly amounts to nothing. This is a humbling experience. Your ego hurts a bit. But finally you become comfortable with who you are, your beliefs, your tastes and your history.
powered by performancing firefox
Review: Amores Perros (Love’s a bitch)
Rating: 8/10
By now, we know that Alejandro Gonarez Inarritu is a great film-maker. He has directed two more brilliant movies (21 Grams, Babel) and two amazing short films (one of the 11 in 9′11″01, and one for the BMW series). But in his debut film itself, he shows his prowess.

The plot consists of three intersecting stories, linked by an accident shown at the start of the movie. There is Octavio, in love with his sister-in-law, Susana. He decides to fight his dog in order to make enough for them to leave his brother and mother for ever. The second story is of Valeria,a famous model and Daniel,a magazine publisher, who leaves his wife for Valeria. They are also affected strongly by the accident. The third involves an old revolutionary, Chivo, who now does “jobs” for a sum. He longs to talk to his long-separated daughter (who thinks he’s dead).
The plot will invoke comparisons with Pulp Fiction, but the similarities are (mostly) superficial. This movie is more emotional, less “fun”, but almost as entertaining.
The themes follow from one story to another. The first and the second share a theme of betrayal and infidelity, and the second and third are both about lost glory. There are subtle and rich implications present in all stories (How do you trust a person who has betrayed someone, even if he betrayed them for you? Will you yourself, if given a chance, kill a man who you paid to have killed?)
But there is almost nothing these stories share superficially, except the accident, and dogs. Dogs are important to all three stories. The trained dogs do wonderful jobs.
The acting is uniformly good, although some actors shine more than others, particularly Goya Toledo (Valeria), who is intense, and Emilio Echevarría (Chivo), who says much with his eyes. Watch how Emilio’s voice trembles during the penultimate scene of the movie.
Inarritu amazes with his direction in his debut film. The pacing is excellent, and so is the editing. The atmosphere is heavy. The moie is slickly shot, and Inarritu directs with a moving camera, which involves us immediately in the action. Reminds me of Scorcese.
There are problems, however. Most of them lie with the story. As I said, these movies share almost nothing superficially, and the movie feels like three stories, not one. The first story is a rather cliched one, and is saved only by Inarritu’s blazing direction. “Daniel and Valeria” deserved more time, as it is the most heart-wrenching story of the three.
This also affects the structure, as we cannot return to the earlier stories after we move on (unlike 21 Grams, which handled 3 stories in parallel). The structure feels fragmented, like Pulp Fiction, which was able to avoid this difficulty by entertaining us thoroughly. Here, we get emotionally involved, and it is dissapointing to not return to Valeria’s story after Chivo’s tale begins.
But Inarritu succeeds at making a strong debut, and tell three disconnected stories, covering a range of emotions and situations equally well. At times he is playful, at times dramatic, at times stylish, but always brilliant.
Notes:
-I was particularly impressed at how he intercut the sequences to show the time order of the events.
- Two characters from different stories turns lights on-and-off when they are uneasy.
- The middle story is almost unconnected from the other two, which are more strongly connected. Again reminds me of Pulp Fiction, and the place of Bruce Willis’s story in it.
- Inarritu reportedly said that “Love’s a Bitch” is not an accurate translation, so I don’t know whether the title is meant as a pun or not.
Edit: Added a note about structure.
—-
Posted in Movies
Pirates Of Cochin: Curse Of The Retarded Politicians
I am a film addict. At this point who isn’t? I remember a time when mentioning names like Wong Kar Wai or Akira Kurusawa in a conversation would result in raised eyebrows and sneers. Now, every other dawg is an Almadovar fan or a Fellini freak. I really don’t know how much of the works by these directors are being understood by this new wave of (pseudo?) cine-philes. My fix of films come from the good old pirated CD/DVD dealers in Cochin. There is this little shop where the dude will get me any movie I ask for, even if no one else wants it; he’d get me one copy. We have a relationship going back over 5 years. There is a whole black market of pirated stuff here and it is quite efficient. I have found gems in these shops that are not found in bigger metros like Banglore and Chennai.
The new anti-piracy drive by the Govt. is a blatant attempt at killing my supply of illicit escapism. Here’s what is happening-
The Police are raiding stores and DVD/VCD rental shops, and confisticating everything they have. My good friend, the pirate of cochin had his entire collection confisticated. This man is not only a pirate, he is a serious movie buff. He has 3 versions of Citizen Kane with him- DVD conversions of varying quality. He is a collector and supplier par excellence. But it’s all illegal. The cops even confisticated blank CDs and DVDs. All in all, this brother lost over Rs. 9 lakhs in merchandise. Woah!
I know that piracy is wrong, that it is illegal and kills the movie industry. But here is my argument for it. The Malayalam film industry is a con. The home videos are of such low quality that you’d wonder where the Rs.300 you shell out for a DVD is spent. The conversion is bad- some of the older films are actually converted from video cassettes. There are no multiple audio tracks. There is no bonus material whatsoever. A rough estimation by me pegs the true value of these DVDs (including a generous profit) at about Rs.120. The pirated version is only Rs.100. So why shell out more for the same shit. The legal version of the DVD should provide the consumers with some incentives for it’s purchase.
I don’t always go for the pirated DVDs; I have a collection of original DVDs (foreign films) too. There is quality in conversions and a slew of bonus features that I wouldn’t get in a pirated DVD, so I have no reservations in paying the price printed on it’s back. Some of the films that you really want never make it legally to the CD/DVD shops. Films by Ozu, Kobayashi, Kar Wai, to name a few, are not there on any shelves in any CD/DVD shops selling legal DVDs. Ordering it online is an option, but I’ve done it and I’ve gotten a broken disc with me to remind me to never try that again.
Another point I’d like to raise is the censorship of original DVD content by the Censor Board. The original DVD of Irreversible by Gasper Noe is actually 16 minutes shorter than the actual film. Y Tu Mama Tambien has been cut too- very abrupt cuts. The pirated DVDs feature pristine conversions and no such censoring. Not to mention, films like The Last Temptation Of Christ are actually banned in India and piracy is the only way of getting it.
So in a country where good films seldom reach theatres, where there are no incentives for buying an original CD/DVD, where half the films that do reach legally are censored, why should I buy or wait for an original DVD? I agree again that piracy is illegal. But in many cases, it is the only option. It is a thriving business because of this, even with the raids on. I can still get the DVDs from the pirates of Cochin and I will keep buying it.
powered by performancing firefox
