Scribez

Why are mobile market giants like Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Samsung, Research in Motion and the likes trying to compete with iPhone in the “touch” department. iPhone is a breakaway success because it changed the way people perceived a cell phone. Multi-touch has definitely been a revolution. Unless the other players come up with something that capitalizes on the drawbacks of the iPhone, while simultaneously rewriting the concept of a cell phone, iPhone is only going to have clone competitors!

Blogged with Flock

Tags: iphone, nokia, sony ericsson, apple, samsung, research in motion, business, future, telecom, mobile

A while ago there came Scrybe (which let me remind you has got nothing to do with us) and it ‘wow’ed me and some of the many others that I knew. But something happened after that event. Nothing much captured my attention since then and I ‘backslid’ from the blogosphere and all that it had to offer me. Now once again I’m drawn back to the magic that once so captivated my attention. So with an apology for not writing about anything for the past couple of months and thereby keeping you in the dark here I venture back.

Now, let me get this straight. It appears to me that the past couple of months have been ‘dry’ - technologically speaking that is. What I mean to say is when I look at my RSS feed list in Google Reader(which has something like 500 un-read items in it) I still see the same news I saw about 3 months back when I decided to take a sabbatical.

• Google Spreadsheet has officially become one of the most sought after ‘free’ alternatives to MS Office.
• Office 2007 blows minds away but no one able to justify the need to spend close to half a grand to purchase the application.
• iPhone’s (oops IPhone) unveiling manages to make the world hold its breath for a second. Cisco seizes opportunity to steal a little thunder from Apple.
• Vista gets launched amongst varied levels of fanfare – Apart from all the hype about it being the next big thing no one can tell exactly WHY it is indeed the next big thing.
• Wikipedia and its search engine Wikiasari (or whatever name it decides to take up) is sure making some noise but it is yet to be seen if it’ll pose any threat to Google.
• Web 3.0 fascinates almost all of the internet community but no one seems to be able to explain the concept in English.

Although the same stories seem to circulate around the ‘webosphere’, we at Scribez have decided its time to get of our lazy behinds and get back in the game of quality blogging.However just to bring some variety this year I, for one, will be focusing more on developments in Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 along with areas like Business Intelligence and some others too.

Next week we’ll be focusing on the evolution of the web in itself! Till then ciao.

I am tonight, a man on a mission. I will be putting aside my modesty when I write this blog. Those thinking that I am blowing my own pipe will actually realize that they feel the same way deep inside. For tonight, I am angry-as-hell at a pathetic group of people hell bent on ruining a good vibe - The Pretenders (and to a lesser extent, The Wanna-be).

What ripped my facade of tolerance and fueled my rage today was a statement by a man of stunted intellectual abilities claiming that he has been an Iron Maiden fan since he was in the 6th grade. His favourite Maiden album being Brave New World which he claims to have bought in 7th grade. That would be in 1997-98. The album of course came out in 2000. As a Maiden fan and a serious music buff, I was shocked at this blasphemy. It is understandable that such a statement would be uttered to raise one’s position in a social circle. It is also inevitable that such statements will now be flying around since Maiden will be performing in Bangalore. We got into an argument when I revealed the true time of release of the said album. As expected, he lost his temper and I lost mine. My rage stemmed from the fact that every song that the bastard had in his computer came from my collection. His social networking site profile shows the name of every artist who’s song he has burned and taken from me. And he thinks he can argue with me on music?

This incident only serves as a starting point to my rant. There are people who claim to be big fans of serious films. Any attempt
at discussing any of the “admired” films reveal the shallow depths of their
understanding of the film and the searing heights of their illusions of
grandeur. The same goes for games. Idiots who claim that Half Life is boring because the graphics are dated. The same goes for books. Idiots who claim that they are fans of The Da Vinci Code and go around talking about Magdalene and The Priory like they’ve researched about it for years.

The main point that I am trying to discuss here is that these fermented remnants of bovine excreta don’t have a point of view of their own but keep peddling articles and reviews from other sources as if it’s their own ideas. I must point out that there are those who use the same said sources to enhance their understanding rather than define it. I see no harm in this form of growth. Everyone does that, you shape your ideas based on others’. But to claim that these ideas are your own is indecent and below human dignity. There are many who mock me for my tastes but secretly they
wish they had it. One develops a sense of identity by first assuming
others’ and then growing into their own (ofcourse there are the
counter-culturists, but again, they grow into their own identities as well).

When a wanna-be tries to up the ante on you, you get pissed. Not just because the credibility of his argument is suspect, or the fact that he will not accept his fault when all is revealed, but also because it is demeaning to your ego when a person of clearly inferior intellect tries to undermine yours. The target of a pretender’s verbal diarrhea is always the intellectual. By proving that he is superior to the intellectual, the pretender basks in the false sense of his superiority.

I was a pretender once. There isn’t anyone anywhere who hasn’t claimed to have done this or done that while he never has. But slowly, I grew older and a bit wiser. The lies and deceits that one creates around one-self to exude a false aura of superiority slowly begins to appear pointless and you realize your real worth and standing in the world, which mostly amounts to nothing. This is a humbling experience. Your ego hurts a bit. But finally you become comfortable with who you are, your beliefs, your tastes and your history.

powered by performancing firefox

I am a film addict. At this point who isn’t? I remember a time when mentioning names like Wong Kar Wai or Akira Kurusawa in a conversation would result in raised eyebrows and sneers. Now, every other dawg is an Almadovar fan or a Fellini freak. I really don’t know how much of the works by these directors are being understood by this new wave of (pseudo?) cine-philes. My fix of films come from the good old pirated CD/DVD dealers in Cochin. There is this little shop where the dude will get me any movie I ask for, even if no one else wants it; he’d get me one copy. We have a relationship going back over 5 years. There is a whole black market of pirated stuff here and it is quite efficient. I have found gems in these shops that are not found in bigger metros like Banglore and Chennai.

The new anti-piracy drive by the Govt. is a blatant attempt at killing my supply of illicit escapism. Here’s what is happening-

The Police are raiding stores and DVD/VCD rental shops, and confisticating everything they have. My good friend, the pirate of cochin had his entire collection confisticated. This man is not only a pirate, he is a serious movie buff. He has 3 versions of Citizen Kane with him- DVD conversions of varying quality. He is a collector and supplier par excellence. But it’s all illegal. The cops even confisticated blank CDs and DVDs. All in all, this brother lost over Rs. 9 lakhs in merchandise. Woah!

I know that piracy is wrong, that it is illegal and kills the movie industry. But here is my argument for it. The Malayalam film industry is a con. The home videos are of such low quality that you’d wonder where the Rs.300 you shell out for a DVD is spent. The conversion is bad- some of the older films are actually converted from video cassettes. There are no multiple audio tracks. There is no bonus material whatsoever. A rough estimation by me pegs the true value of these DVDs (including a generous profit) at about Rs.120. The pirated version is only Rs.100. So why shell out more for the same shit. The legal version of the DVD should provide the consumers with some incentives for it’s purchase.

I don’t always go for the pirated DVDs; I have a collection of original DVDs (foreign films) too. There is quality in conversions and a slew of bonus features that I wouldn’t get in a pirated DVD, so I have no reservations in paying the price printed on it’s back. Some of the films that you really want never make it legally to the CD/DVD shops. Films by Ozu, Kobayashi, Kar Wai, to name a few, are not there on any shelves in any CD/DVD shops selling legal DVDs. Ordering it online is an option, but I’ve done it and I’ve gotten a broken disc with me to remind me to never try that again.

Another point I’d like to raise is the censorship of original DVD content by the Censor Board. The original DVD of Irreversible by Gasper Noe is actually 16 minutes shorter than the actual film. Y Tu Mama Tambien has been cut too- very abrupt cuts. The pirated DVDs feature pristine conversions and no such censoring. Not to mention, films like The Last Temptation Of Christ are actually banned in India and piracy is the only way of getting it.

So in a country where good films seldom reach theatres, where there are no incentives for buying an original CD/DVD, where half the films that do reach legally are censored, why should I buy or wait for an original DVD? I agree again that piracy is illegal. But in many cases, it is the only option. It is a thriving business because of this, even with the raids on. I can still get the DVDs from the pirates of Cochin and I will keep buying it.

powered by performancing firefox

Director: Pedro Almodovar

Rating: 8.5/10

There is a vein of dark humour that runs in all of Almodovar’s films. Volver is no exception. Though Almodovar simplifies his narrative, he still layers it with his usual repertoire of wit, sensitivity and not to mention- an obsession with women. Penelope Cruz excels under her mentor’s directing again (after All About My Mother). This is by far her best performance to date and long expected one.

The plot revolves Raimunda (Penelope Cruz), her daughter Paula (Yohana Cobo) and Raimunda’s sister Sole (Lola Duenas). Raimunda lives with Paco, the two have a very cold relationship. The events lead upto Paula killing her father after he tries to make moves on her. The film uses converging parallel narratives of Raimunda and Paula trying to get rid of the body while trying to re-build their lives and that of Sole being visited by her dead mother. There is also the story of Augustina, whose mother left her 4 years before and she hopes to find out what happened to her. All this leads to a powerful, emotional and revealing conclusion that is definitely Almodovar’s.

One of the problems I had with this film was it’s pace- the film meanders a bit here and there. But over all, the acting, the directing and the script holds you by the balls (and thats the sign of a good film). Cruz is divine. I am rooting for her to win the best actress Oscar this year. The cinematography by Jose Luis Alcaine and editing by Jose Salcedo is good, but then again, this is a director’s film. the music by Alberto Iglesias is forgettable, but the song Volver, sung by Penelope Cruz stays in your mind.

On Almadovar
There are very few directors who capture women on screen as well as Almodovar (Wong Kar Wai is the best for me). The way he frames the actors and the way he nurtures the characters in a film is quite intriguing. He is an auteur beyond compare and arguably one of the best directors alive. But what makes his films tick? As I mentioned before, there is always the dark humour, but I feel the reason why his films stand out is because he is a humanist. He cares about his characters and he cares about what they represent. Almodovar talks not about death in this film but about the “rich culture surrounding death”. Discussing philosophy in a simple narrative is Almodovar’s gift.

On Cruz
Cruz is beautifull, Cruz is divine and with this film she shows she is a great actress too. Her range and depth is used exceptionally well here. I liked her in Vanilla Sky but I loved her here. The screen oozes with her presence and her energy. She brings a poignancy and believability to the role of Raimunda. Penelope Cruz succeeds in making us care for her character. This is not method acting; for this to happen you need a screen presence and charisma that only true stars can bring to a film. Cruz is…(I better stop).

Though a film that I thoroughly enjoyed, it is not without problems. There is the occasional drift into melodrama and the ending that leaves a few too many questions unanswered. But overall I was won over by Penelope Cruz’s performance of a lifetime and Almodovar’s great direction. As artists, the mentor and the apprentice seems to have reached a level where both are now peers.

(p.s. I saw it on pirated DVDs. Take that Indian Police.)

Review by: bApHoMEt

powered by performancing firefox

Continuing to the Part ][ of the series started by Apple Gazette of the 5 Predictions for Apple in 2007, here are the list of the 5 Predictions for Linux in 2007! Before we look ahead, a small flashback over 2006. This was The year that changed Linux, with Oracle becoming a Linux distributor, Microsoft and Novell partnering to make Linux and Windows more compatible, rift between the Linux core developers and FSF and a lot more happening.

What is really interesting is the fact that the Linux community itself is forking considering that even old-schoolers and pioneers joining hands with proprietary licenses, with reference to ESR joining the Freespire board. It was in ESR’s book itself and as part of the Halloween document 1 discussion that ESR noticed and acknowledged the strongest point of the Linux community being a central control over “no-forking” as forking decreases the amount of glory received as part of the contribution to the community. However, like any human, I love drama and this is exactly why watching the Linux community is going to be really interesting over 2007. Here are a list of things that I am going to be on the lookout for. In no particular order

1. Rise of the Linux “Big Business” Corporates
These include all the Big Business boys who promote Open Source Software and are earning bucks out of the Open Source Business Model. All of them are eyeing to make some $$$, now that Linux has proved itself to be a mission critical trustworthy player. That includes Debian, Novell, Red Hat, and joining the latest into the race signing a deal with Sun, is Canonical [the parent of Ubuntu]

2. Rise/Race of the Desktop Linux
Linux has certainly evolved from a command line “toy” for the green-glowing screen CRTs to a slick desktop, with a lot more interesting eye-candy than Vista or OSX. [Well at least to the eyes of the slightly more than average computer user]. thanks to Compiz, Beryl! Furthermore these effects are to a large extent community support based and independent of the hardware - whether it be a PC or a Mac. Ubuntu Linux is _the_ most popular free Linux that’s being used, in both the PCs and the Macs. What are the other communities going to do? And how is this going to affect the rise of the desktop Linux?

3. What are the FSF policies going to be in GPLv3.0
FSF is against DRM. Vista and OS X.5 [Leopard] have built in support for DRM based working environments. Who’s going to win in this war[???]? Is there going to be scuffle between the big vendors supporting DRM and the FSF community?

4. Any chance of Googubuntu?
There was a rumor that Google was working on a desktop OS that is googlicized [I call this term :D]. Will it be coming true as part of 2007 list of surprises by Google? Will they finally decide to have a “consumer-first” based OS? We’ll have to wait and see

5. How many forks are going to happen as a result of people against GPLv3.0?
Firefox vs IceWeasel, Linux core developers against FSF. Who goes where? Or is there going to be peace and harmony and solid work, which has been the success of Linux rising as a desktop OS today!

All this and more to be looked forward to!! Coming soon to a world near you - 2007!!

This marks an end to our list of predictions of the Windows and Linux community. Wishing you all and happy and fun and prosperous 2007.

Got more, disagree, or just wanna tip us off with more information? Pop in a comment here…

Originally posted by gurupanguji @ Bracketed Bull…

Linux - and free software in general - have been traditionally plagued with one constant concern by the non-users [by that I mean the Windows and the Mac bandwagon] that there are far too many choices. Which Linux flavor to choose? You have Red Hat, Suse, Debian, Gentoo, Fedora, Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Edubuntu, Unnamedubuntu, and what not. Windows has XP and Mac has OSX. I personally believed [as highlighted here] that it was perfect with the ideology of FSF. Concept of freedom [as in free speech] brings about a related concept of choice. There are many people believing in many ideologies, methods and concepts there. The same is obviously extended to the software developers as well. [They are human for uninitiated] So, you have very many software that are generated.

Saying you have just way too many choices is like saying you have too many choices when you go to buy a pair of running shoes. Or saying you have far too many options when you go to buy a mobile connection. Why should software be any different? You’d expect the user to be aware of the options, and choose or make a mistake just like _any_ consumer market!!

Anyway, Microsoft, with its release of multiple options for Windows Vista may have either finally accepted this or have joined the bandwagon.

Microsoft offers 4 separate versions of Windows Vista - Vista Home Basic, Vista Home Premium, Vista Business and Vista Ultimate! Hmm, maybe it’s the year for options after all ;-)!

Does more choice generally mean that it’s better or is it confusing? What do you think? Post your thoughts in the comments section!!

Originally posted by gurupanguji @ Bracketed Bull…

This is an article that stemmed in my head when I was thinking about starting my own web 2.0 based business. Considering the various factors that go into any such business, one of the chief concerns that pop into this is the web-design itself. The typical way this would work is I approach a Web-designer and buy a design / pay him to develop a design for me. And then I buy the design from him. The web-designer, if he’s smart enough would charge for

1. Time for designing
2. The design itself
3. Implementing / Customizing the design for a webpage.

Now, thinking as a smart web-designer, if you think that the Web-site is going to be a hit and will involve evolution of the site itself, you’d swarm the entity [person/firm] who’s enrolled you to create the design into a maintenance contract. This would ensure you that you are paid enough money for enhancing the current design. This could also be offered by you as a designer for a certain amount of money.

Thinking as an smarter web-designer, with a little bit of know-how on the Web2.0 upcoming boom, with enough money slowly being pumped in, you can advertise yourself as a Web2.0 Web-designer [basically pastel shades, with Aqua like alpha, AJAX based interfaces yada yada yada] and what you can actually do, is if you feel that the web-site is going to a tremendous hit, you should try and rope in a “percentage cut model”. IOW, depending on the traffic, you can ask for a cut of the profit that the website is making. More like an investment. Now, depending on your experience you’ll know how to rope in your customers and offer which model ;-)! However, this is just a suggestion that I thought many web-designers may not have thought about.

As a web-designer, what do you think about this particular business model? Is it good/bad/so-so? Lemme know in your comments.

Posted by gurupanguji.

Orkut - one of the most popular social communities out there. Of course nothing beats MySpace [just check out the number of hits we get to the post referring to MySpace :-D]. However, I prefer[red] orkut to the rising community sites of that time [Yeah I enrolled in orkut about 4 years ago] - Hi5. Now, the reason why I chose orkut was a point noted by one of my best friends. Orkut did NOT allow just anyone to join. Consequently, this had reduced/limited the potential possibility of unruly, uncouth people and stuck to the concept of being a truly social community site. You’d invite only your real friends to the site.

However, things have changed now. Orkut is now open - Check out the “Join Now” option at Orkut.com login page! Now, Google has been very good at blocking people with malicious intent in orkut, however, inspite of all that Google tries, orkut still has a lot of flab in terms of porn and other unsocial stuff. Ok, I am never averse to porn, it’s just that I really don’t wanna use a service where in most of my friends/family are present to search and utilize for something like porn :-D! But then again, that’s a personal choice.

Ok, I am digressing! Coming back to the topic - orkut being open and now containing the ability to message communities as a whole, might be the next viral marketing platform. And this extends to any social community based websites. For e.g. since orkut has opened, “agents” have already have started it to communicate about land availability, buildings for sale, LIC insurance options, tax saving investments, and what not? I have already posted about resumes being posted left, right and center in the communities of firms/organizations!

There are some questions you can ask here in terms of - why is Google not stopping that, considering that this is spam? Well, the truth is - these firms with huge investments / returns from the ad-market, would definitely want to capitalize on their investments into the social community pie!! I am saying that orkut is going to be one of the most useful investments that Google made ever. [I am sure that they would know exactly why they invested in orkut. This is nothing but a hypothesis]

Why is orkut going to be useful for Google in the future?

And in a broader sense, why are the major Ad Players raking up on the social communities pie? You have Microsoft with MSN Spaces - Oops, Windows Live Spaces, Yahoo! - with Y! 360 and Google with orkut! What sense does it make for companies like Microsoft to even invest in an ONLINE SOCIAL COMMUNITY?

Well, apart from the fact that they are now becoming an essential part of the Internet package - email/IM/community, they are sitting gold-mines! Rightly predicted in the 2007 Predictions over at Read/Write Web

Expect some shakeups in the online advertising market next year. AdSense will have some competition, in the form of MSN AdCenter and Yahoo’s advertising platform

http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2007_web_predictions.php
- under Search and Online Advertising

Social Community Advantage #1: A sitting gold-mine for advertisement. Companies can post advertisements pertaining to the community. You can bet your life’s savings that people are going to click. And you can put all your eggs saying that that’s going to be the case soon enough.

Social Community Advantage #2: They are consumer-base. People who are using your packages are bound to at least “test” your social community. Make it a success, with enough people and enough contact with people within that community hitch up [ok going too much] but at least meet, you are setting up your consumer base.

Social Community Advantage #3: What better than YOUR community to evangelize your products? Let’s take the latest example - How many orkut users would have decided to give Google Talk a Go - since the tight [almost] integration of orkut and Google Talk. [Btw this was long due for Google, considering that MSN Spaces or is it Live Spaces now? is tightly integrated with Live Messenger and Y! 360 is tightly integrated with Y! Messenger].

The war on Advertising is definitely going to be interesting in 2007. We see that people are already starting to realize the potential of orkut/social communities as a perfect way to reach a niche crowd. For e.g. an insurance salesman could easily target an IT firm and post a message regarding insurance options / tax saving investments. While this is largely beneficial to the salesman and the community, it might be misused!! Are Google and other players taking the necessary precautions to prevent the next generation of spamming through this?

Let us know by your comments and trackbacks, what do _you_ think are the reason for social communities for these big players in the Internet?

Originally Posted by gurupanguji @ Bracketed Bull…

Open Source: The buzz word for the year 2007. From being a bunch of geeks who revolutionized the computing industry, it has grown quite a lot. The world, well at least the computing world, agrees that it’s the next best thing to sliced cheese [and trust me sliced cheese is God sent to the people in the computing world]. I was reading up on the Open Source Business Model, wondering how and what was the money maker of Open Source based companies - web based and stand-alone applications wise. This got me thinking, as a professional software developer, the amount of opportunity and the threats it presents and poses to people like me.

Now, let me define Professional Software Developer: It’s a term that I coined right now to define, and include those developers who write code to make a living, well at least anyone who develops software to make some money out of the process of “coding”.

Now, what is the Open Source Business Model for Software? Traditionally, companies put a lot of value to the actual source code, for a variety of reasons [1]. Now, the code itself is not idolized anymore. How? Well, by providing the source code, free of charge to anyone who wants to use it / understand it / contribute to it, under a variety of “public licenses” - viz. GPL, CC, to name a few. This is a major shift from the “closed source” paradigm.

Under the closed source paradigm, software developers were paid - a lot of money at times - to develop the code base. This had a lot of value, understandably as the company paid quite a hefty amount of money to get it developed, in spite of getting it done real cheap in outsourcing sweatshops in India ;-).

Under the open source paradigm, most of the companies rely on volunteers [a queer word comes into my mind - developer volunteers ???] to develop the code - read Software Developers with a lot of free time??! Now, this cuts down the value of the “source code” to NIL! Save for the laptop sticker (optional), a few T-shirts and due credits given in the “About Us” page ;-), which costs the company practically NOTHING! Now, this also shifts the company’s focus from a traditional software sweatshop to focusing on products, features, service, support, and other value-add services. And it’s these things, which is going to fetch the money to the company anyway, at least in the long run. The software code base itself has no value. Furthermore, it only makes sense for people to contribute to it and have a community based brainstorming for adding features, removing bugs etc.

E.g. Consider the major technologies used in the Web-Applications today - Java, Apache, Linux, MySQL, PHP, etc!! All Open Source, Worthy mentions are of course .Net Web Services, however, let’s not include that here. =D!

P.S. This makes an excellent case for any start-up with limited technology resources to vote and opt - Open Source btw

So, what does this mean to you as a Professional Software Developer? There are two situations you can read from here - Opportunity and Despair.

Let’s tackle the positive one first - Opportunity. One word - NDAs / Contracts. The Closed Source Paradigm typically enforces the software developer cannot use code from his just done / developing project for any of his practical use. Furthermore, majority of the companies for which you will work for, will also have a “Service Agreement” clause, which will not let you work for ANY OTHER COMPANY/product other than for the one you are working, until your contract expires/is revoked by your company. Also, any development you do is NOT your property but is officially the company’s Intellectual Property, for which it gets to file the patents and get the royalty.

The Open Source Paradigm caters to the I-want-variety-in-this-boring-existence-of-mine side of the software development. You can go independent and work for any project you want, which is ready to “hire” you for major concerns of development as well as design decisions. Not only that, it also allows you to go independent and put your hand in a variety of projects, some which pay, some which cater to your interest in the world [Ok!! Development world :-P]. So, you can consider this as an opportunity to grow and expand your profile.

Now, if you can write as well, start a blog, which accounts for your daily experience in the programming world. As there are no NDAs with the projects you work on, you can use real life example code for your work, put Adsense and tada - you’re making money out of what you do best and what you really like - developing code. So, that’s so much for opportunity!!

Despair: Now, let’s give some attention to despair - the negative aspect of this. As a software developer, as soon as the company you are working for realizes that the ROI in maintaining closed source is not worth paying the current set of developers in the payroll, you are out of a job. Just as outsourcing was a major job-cutter, Open Source and Ready to work for real cheap money College Students with development experience are going to handle the code! As tough as this may seem, this could be a prediction of the future.

However, things are not so glum. As part of your “career objectives” set in your company, I am sure that one of the clauses would be “Improve Technology Knowledge” or “Update yourself with the latest trends in technology” or something to that effect. Everybody’s been through that. Now, it’s time to actually make use of some company time to actually enforce that particular Responsibility Area. Get involved in the latest Open Source Technologies / trends like PHP, Python, Java, Ruby, Apache, AJAX, yada yada yada. You get what I mean, learn it and make sure that you highlight that you have done justice to that objective in your next appraisal. And when the time comes that the company decides to try out Open Source technologies, you are way up there in the forefront, already having knowledge of the same. A time for promotion?? I think so ;-)!

Note: This situation is applicable ONLY to the general software development companies and it DOES NOT incorporate the niche software development companies like Medical Solutions or Financial Solutions. Although certain aspects of even these applications will be at the very least BASED on Open Source Technologies soon. Companies involved in these have already spent WAY too much money and resources in developing something that’s so highly proprietary that they will not, at least for a very good amount of time, say 10-20 years even consider making the source code of the binaries that earns them MILLIONS of $$$ a year, OPEN!!

Also, there are companies like IBM and Novell, who are neither here, nor fully there, the in-betweens, who are software houses developing Open Source software - Ideal place to work right now for the Open Source oriented Professional Software Developer, eh ;-)!

Footnotes:
[1] Reasons include theft, software / IP patents on the source code, competitors using to reverse engineer the system design, malicious use of the source code for hacking/cracking/gain private information etc.

Sources / Further Reading about Open Source Business Models
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source_vs._closed_source
[2] http://www.extropia.com/tutorials/misc/opensourcebiz.html
[3] http://web.corante.com/editorial/archives/2006/07/the_open_source_revenue_model.php

Posted by gurupanguji